Safe experimentation

A/B test your agents.
With real work. Zero risk.

Clone any agent with proposed changes. The original keeps serving your business unchanged. The clone runs in parallel on the same inputs for up to 7 days, until you have evidence, not guesses.

Two tracks. Seven days. One decision.

Both tracks process the same real-world work, side by side, for up to 7 days.

Same Business Data
TasksConversationsInputs

The same real work feeds both tracks, every day

Active Agent

Your live agent, untouched

Current config
UnchangedPrompt · Personality · Model held constant
D0D1D2D3D4D5D6D7

Same work, original config. Holds a steady baseline to measure against.

Shadow Clone

A copy under test, running in parallel

Modified config
TestingPPromptTPersonalityMModel+Combined
ORIGINAL BASELINEclear signalD0D1D2D3D4D5D6D7

Same work, modified config. The signal sharpens as evidence accumulates.

DAY 7

The owner decides

Evidence, not guesses. Pick one.

PROMOTE
Clone replaces the original
CHERRY-PICK
Adopt only the changes that worked
DISCARD
Keep the original, drop the clone

PROMOTE

Replace the original entirely

The clone becomes the new live agent. All changes applied at once.

When: The clone clearly outperformed the original across the board. Not easily reversible.

CHERRY-PICK

Apply only the changes that worked

A side-by-side comparison shows every field that differs. Check the wins, leave the rest. Surgical adoption, not all-or-nothing.

When: Some changes helped, others didn't. Personality landed; the new model was too slow.

DISCARD

The safe default

Throw the clone away. The original continues unchanged. Comparison data is kept for reference; the clone stops running.

When: The clone underperformed, or the test was inconclusive. Zero impact on the live agent.

Change one thing. Or change them all.

P

Role Prompt

Rewrite how the agent thinks. Change its priorities, its decision framework, or its domain focus.

T

Personality

Adjust tone, verbosity, formality. Same brain, different communication style.

M

LLM Model

Sonnet vs Haiku, GPT vs Gemini. Is the quality improvement worth the cost difference? Side-by-side examples answer the question.

+

Combined

Change everything at once. New prompt, new personality, new model. Compare the full package against the original.

What it looks like in your industry.

HVAC

Model Upgrade: Haiku to Sonnet

Clone the CMO with Sonnet. Run both for a week. Is the quality improvement worth the higher cost per call? Side-by-side examples answer the question.

Test: Model · Duration: 7 days · Compare: quality vs cost

RESTAURANT

Casual vs Professional Tone

Same prompt, same model. Clone the CEO with a casual, in-the-trenches personality. After a week: which version do you actually act on?

Test: Personality · Duration: 3-5 days · Compare: engagement

ACCOUNTING

Tax Season Mode

Clone the CEO with a tax-season prompt: filing deadlines, staff overtime, document collection. Run it for 7 days during peak season. Does it catch deadline risks the year-round version misses?

Test: Role prompt · Duration: 7 days · Compare: focus

Shadow Clone tests configurations. Validation Agents test outputs.

Shadow Clone answers 'should I change how this agent works?' Validation Agents answer 'is this specific output trustworthy?' They solve different problems and work together.

See Validation Agents →

Test before you commit.

Book a call and we will show you how Shadow Clone lets you experiment safely on your live business data.